In a Legal Insight post from 2014, ‘The
Future of Law: Disappearing Legal Library and Virtual Firms’ an infographic
showed that by 2044 45% of respondents surveyed believed that their legal
library would virtually disappear.
Ignoring the opportunities to analyse the phrase “virtually
disappear”, I’m choosing to assume that this is in reference to physical floor
space. Sure, there’s our physical collections will continue to shrink – but
even by 2044, I doubt that everything we hold in print will be available
electronically. Or at least in a functional way.
A more recent Thomson Reuters Whitepaper, Law
Libraries’ Digital Revolution, discusses the benefits of moving to
eBook collections.
Now, I’m pro eBook in theory. If only they worked the same
as a hardcopy.
Consider:
- Mental topography, or, when we read on dead trees, do we retain more? (See: The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens).
- eBooks don’t necessarily equal a saving in money (or time).
- Speed of retrieval: catalogue-shelf-read v log in to website-borrow book-log out of website-download and install app-log into app-download book-read (streamlined to avoid the wifi won’t connect matters).
- Many publishers only sell eBooks to individuals, so the Library is left out of the bargain.
- The ability to mark up, tag, refer to in court, not electrocute yourself when you drop it in the bathtub….
- The availability of indexes – sure I can search the electronic encyclopaedia but what if I just want to browse for a topic?
- Delays in the new edition of a book becoming available in eBook, out of date materials are a big danger in any practice.
- Inter Library Loans. Libraries have fewer avenues for access to legal materials held in other collections. This of course has a great impact on the public who have restricted access to legal information already by virtue of case report series sitting behind publisher paywalls.
Alice Hewitt,
ALLA (WA) Secretary 2017-2018
Comments
Post a Comment